Haynes

Haynes v. Uponor, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20224:21-cv-05480California2,005 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOYT HAYNES, et al., Case No. 21-cv-05480-PJH Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO COMPEL AND DENYING

UPONOR, INC., et al., DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 33

13 Defendants’ motion to compel or dismiss came on for hearing before this court on February 3, 2022. Plaintiffs appeared through their counsel, Penny Manship and Ron Hartman. Defendants appeared through their counsel, Jeffrey Goldman and Howard Lieber. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part defendants’ motion, for the following reasons. BACKGROUND Hoyt Haynes and Felicia M. Haynes (“plaintiffs”) bring a class action lawsuit against Uponor Inc. and Uponor North America Inc. (“defendants”) that manufacture blue and red colored…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.