Diaz

Diaz v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20223:22-cv-01136California518 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:20-cv-09454-FLA (MAAx) Date February 23, 2022

Title Alicia Noemi Bautista Diaz v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. et al.

Present: The Honorable FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

T. Freeman Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER STRIKING NON-PARTY MOHAMMED

RAHMAN’S MOTION TO REMAND [DKT. 37]

On January 7, 2022, non-party Mohammed Rahman (“Rahman”) filed a Motion to Remand (“Motion to Remand”). Dkt. 37. Rahman is not a party to this action. Nor has he moved to intervene in this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24. Thus, Rahman lacks standing to bring a motion to remand. Further, the Motion to Remand fails even if the court were to construe it as a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). In the Motion to Remand, Rahman argues the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because it previously remanded the action to the Los Angeles Superior Court. Dkt. 37…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.