Fallis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMES FALLIS, Case No. 21-cv-05617-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 29 Defendant.

12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Ford Motor Company’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s first amended complaint. Dkt. No. 29 (“Mot.”). Plaintiff opposes portions of the motion, Dkt. No. 30 (“Opp.”), and Defendant replied to Plaintiff’s opposition, Dkt. No. 31 (“Reply”). The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges that he was injured by a “park-to-reverse” defect in a car designed and manufactured by Defendant. See Dkt. No. 24 (“FAC”) ¶¶ 17-20. Plaintiff further alleges that Defendant…