Craven

Craven v. Robertson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20223:20-cv-01933California5,980 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 KALVIN N. CRAVEN, Case No. 20-cv-01933-SI (pr)

Petitioner, ORDER LIFTING STAY; AND

REQUESTING FURTHER BRIEFING

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 38, 50 JIM ROBERTSON, Warden, Respondent.

14 Before the Court is petitioner’s pro se motions to lift the stay in this habeas action, which 15 has been stayed and administratively closed since May 6, 2021. Dkt. Nos. 38, 50. On June 9, 2021, 16 petitioner filed an amended petition. Dkt. No. 39. More recently, petitioner has filed a motion to 17 withdraw his amended petition, which will be construed as a motion for leave to amend the petition 18 and to submit his “perfected amended petition that is fully exhausted removing three [ineffective 19 assistance of counsel (‘IAC’)] issues.” Dkt. No. 50. Attached to petitioner’s most recent filing is his “perfected” amended petition, which will be construed as the second amended petition (“SAP”). Id. at 2-53. Responded opposes petitioner’s motion for leave to file his SAP on the grounds that the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.