Doe
Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANE DOE, Case No. 19-cv-03310-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: UBER’S AMENDED
v. MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF
LETTERS ROGATORY
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 164, 179 Defendants.
12 Uber’s amended motion for issuance of letters rogatory to the Central Authority of Mexico for International Judicial Assistance to obtain the depositions of Ms. Paola Alvarez, Mr. Adan Martinez, and Ms. Lourdes Coss y Leon, all citizens of Mexico, is now pending before the Court. (Dkt. No. 179.) After carefully considering the parties’ briefs and the relevant legal authority, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES March 3, 2022 hearing, and GRANTS Uber’s motion. DISCUSSION A letter rogatory is a formal request “from a court in which an action is pending[ ] to a foreign court to perform some judicial act.” 22 C.F.R. § 92.54; see also Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro…