Klein
Klein v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MAXIMILIAN KLEIN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-08570-JD (VKD)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE NOVEMBER 11, 2021
v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE LAYSER
SUPBOENA
META PLATFORMS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 192 Defendant.
Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (formerly, Facebook, Inc.)1 and Jessica Layser ask the Court to resolve their dispute regarding Facebook’s Rule 45 document subpoena to Ms. Layser. Dkt. No. 192. The Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without a hearing. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons explained below, the Court denies Meta’s request for an order compelling Ms. Layser to produce documents responsive to Meta’s subpoena. I. BACKGROUND Ms. Layser sued Meta on January 13, 2021. Layser v. Facebook, No. 21-cv-00337, Dkt. No. 1. Her case was related to and consolidated with this action. Dkt. No. 47. The consolidated amended complaint on behalf of the Advertiser Plaintiffs names Ms. Layser as a plaintiff. Dkt. No. 86. …