Zhang

Talece Inc. v. Zhang

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20225:20-cv-03579California1,421 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 TALECE INC., Case No. 20-cv-03579-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

ZHENG ZHANG, [Re: ECF No. 93] Defendant.

ZHENG ZHANG, Third-party Plaintiff, v.

LANHAI SU, Third-party Defendant.

18 Before the Court is Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff Zheng Zhang’s motion to strike affirmative defenses asserted in answers to the First Amended Counter- and Third-Party Complaint. ECF No. 93 (“MTS”); see also ECF No. 96 (“Reply”). Zhang seeks to strike the affirmative defenses pled by Plaintiff Talece Inc. and Third-Party Defendant Lanhai Su as inadequately pled under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a) and 9(b). See ECF No. 91 (Talece answer); ECF No. 92 (Su answer). Talece and Su oppose the motion. See ECF No. 95 (“Opp.”). The Court finds this motion suitable for disposition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.