Arebalo

Arebalo v. Apple, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20225:19-cv-03034California3,238 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JOSHUA AREBALO, Case No. 5:19-cv-03034-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO

SEAL

APPLE, INC., Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 77, 80, 81,

13 In connection with Plaintiff Joshua Arebalo’s motion to set aside the settlement agreement (Dkt. No. 71) and Defendant Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) motion to enforce the settlement agreement (Dkt. No. 85), Apple seeks to file portions of its briefs and supporting papers under seal. Dkt. Nos. 77, 80, 89. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Apple’s motions to seal. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.