Barrett
Barrett v. Apple Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 CARL BARRETT, et al., Case No. 20-cv-04812-EJD (VKD)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE FACT DISCOVERY PLAN
v. 10 Re: Dkt. No. 86 APPLE INC., et al., Defendants.
13 At the Court’s direction, the parties have submitted proposed plans for the completion of fact discovery. Dkt. No. 86. They agree on some aspects of the plan but disagree on others. The principal disagreements concern the scheduling of depositions and Apple’s obligations in responding to plaintiffs’ Request for Production No. 23. Id.; see also Dkt. No. 83. 1. Depositions With respect to depositions, Apple reports that it has moved for a protective order preventing plaintiffs from obtaining Rule 30(b)(6) deposition discovery of Apple pending Judge Davila’s resolution of Apple’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint. Dkt. No. 85. Apple objects to setting any deadlines for Rule 30(b)(6) depositions until its protective order motion is resolved. Dkt. No. 86 at…