Bally

Bally v. State Farm Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20223:18-cv-04954California3,202 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ELIZABETH A. BALLY, Case No. 18-cv-04954-CRB Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING BALLY

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON

COUNT II AND COUNT IV

STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 237 12 Defendant. 13 14 In August 2018, Elizabeth Bally filed suit against State Farm Life Insurance 15 Company (“State Farm”) on behalf of a class of policyholders. See Complaint (dkt. 1). 16 Bally alleged that State Farm breached various provisions of its Form 94030 life insurance 17 policy (the “policy”). Id. The complaint set forth four counts for relief. Id. The Court has 18 already ruled on two rounds of summary judgment briefing, and it has granted State Farm 19 summary judgment on Bally’s Count I and Count III claims. See Order on Cross-Motions 20 for Summary Judgment (“MSJ Order II”) (dkt. 222). Count II is the primary remaining 21 claim.1 22 In its most recent summary judgment order, the Court denied State Farm’s motion 23 for summary judgment on Count II. MSJ Order II at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.