Sepehry-Fard

U.S. Bank National Association v. Sepehry-Fard

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20225:22-cv-00628California3,082 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

1 On August 10, 2017, U.S. Bank filed an unlawful detainer action—U.S. Bank, National 2 Association, as Trustee, etc. v. Fareed Sepehry-Fard©, No. 17-CV-314286—against Defendant in 3 Santa Clara Superior Court, alleging that U.S. Bank was entitled to possession of a property in 4 Saratoga, California, of which Defendant was in unlawful possession following U.S. Bank’s Three 5 Day Notice to Quit in July 2017. See Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN”), ECF No. 15, Ex. A ¶¶ 1, 6 4–5, 8–10. Defendant filed an answer to the complaint on September 20, 2017. See U.S. Bank 7 Nat’l Assoc v. Sepehry-Fard©, No. 5:17–cv–7241, ECF No. 9-2 at 17–19. 8 On December 21, 2017, Defendant removed the action to the Northern District of California, 9 commencing Case No. 5:17–cv–7241 before Judge Van Keulen. On January 8, 2018, U.S. Bank 10 moved to remand the case, and on February 1, 2018, Judge Van Keulen issued a Report and 11 Recommendation to grant U.S. Bank’s motion. See U.S. Bank Nat’l Assoc v. Sepehry-Fard©, 12 No. 5:17–cv–7241, ECF Nos. 9, 41. On February 7, 2018, this Court adopted Judge Van Keulen’s 13 Report and Recommendation and granted U.S. Bank’s motion, citing (1)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.