Hubbard

Hubbard v. Ramos

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20224:19-cv-07508California9,677 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ZANE M. HUBBARD, Case No. 19-cv-07508-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT; DENYING

GLORIA RAMOS, DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE

PLAINTIFF’S SUR-OPPOSITION

Defendant. 11 Re: ECF Nos. 29, 35 12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Salinas Valley State Prison (SVSP), filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against SVSP psychiatrist Dr. Gloria Ramos. Now pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the claim that Defendant medicated Plaintiff without his consent in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. ECF No. 29. Plaintiff has filed an opposition, and Defendant has filed a reply. ECF Nos. 30, 32. Plaintiff also filed a “Return to Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition,” ECF No. 33, which Defendant seeks to strike as an unauthorized sur-opposition. ECF No. 35. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s summary judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.