Love

Love v. CHSP TRS San Francisco LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20224:20-cv-07259California4,192 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAMUEL LOVE, Case No. 20-cv-07259-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEYS' FEES AND/OR

SANCTIONS

CHSP TRS SAN FRANCISCO LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 28 Defendant.

Plaintiff Samuel Love filed this case alleging violations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. The court dismissed Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint with prejudice. Order on Mot. to Dismiss (“MTD Order”) [Docket No. 17.] Defendant CHSP TRS San Francisco now moves for attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 12205 and/or sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, 28 U.S.C. § 1927, or the court’s inherent powers. Mot. [Docket No. 28]; Reply [Docket No. 33.] Plaintiff opposes. Opp’n [Docket No. 32.] This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion is denied. I. BACKGROUND The factual allegations are set forth in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.