Stricklin

Stricklin v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20223:21-cv-04511California1,556 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALIVIA JENEEN STRICKLIN, Case No. 21-cv-04511-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Re: Dkt. No. 16, 20 Defendant.

12 I. MOTION TO DISMISS On November 23, 2021, defendant filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint arguing (1) plaintiff’s complaint fails under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) because the causes of action are not supported by requisite and specific facts; (2) plaintiff’s complaint is barred by res judicata; and (3) plaintiff’s complaint fails under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e) because the complaint is “so vague the defendant cannot discern the nature of plaintiff’s claims.” Dkt. No. 16 at 5 and 71 (Motion to Dismiss). The motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. Plaintiff alleges she resides in Monterey, California and states she “sought federal support during December 2013 (January 2014) with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.