Lee v. Bank of America, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HOWARD LEE, Case No. 21-cv-07231-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO DISMISS
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 7 Defendants.
12 Plaintiff Howard Lee, who is representing himself, brings claims against Defendants Bank of America, N.A. and Bank of America Corporation (collectively “BofA”) for negligence, fraud, and contract-related breaches. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is now pending before the Court.1 (Dkt. No. 7.) After carefully considering the parties’ written submissions, the Court concludes that oral argument is not required. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss with leave to amend because the statute of limitations bars some of Plaintiff’s claims and Plaintiff has otherwise failed to state any viable claim against Defendants. BACKGROUND A. Complaint Allegations Plaintiff Howard Lee is a Florida resident. …