Harris

Harris v. Atchley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20223:22-cv-00529California5,055 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL JAY HARRIS, Case No. 22-cv-00529-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF SERVICE, AND DENYING

v. MOTION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER

MATTHEW ATCHLEY, et al., Docket No. 2 Defendants.

12 13 This is a pro se prisoner’s civil rights action. Plaintiff Michael Harris alleges that he is “a convicted child rapist and molester 19 times over,” Docket No. 1 (“Complaint”) ¶ 43, and raises claims regarding about his impending transfer from sensitive needs custody at Salinas Valley State Prison to a non-designated yard at Corcoran State Prison, see generally, id. Mr. Harris also has moved for a temporary restraining order, see Docket No. 2 (“TRO Motion”), and to be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis, see Docket Nos 3, 6 (“IFP Motion”). The Court granted Mr. Harris’s IFP Motion in a separate order. See Docket No. 8. The Complaint is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the reasons set forth below, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.