Arebalo

Arebalo v. Apple, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20225:19-cv-03034California3,685 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JOSHUA AREBALO, Case No. 5:19-cv-03034-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO SET ASIDE

v. SETTLEMENT AND GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

APPLE, INC., ENFORCE SETTLEMENT

Defendant. 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 71,

13 Before the Court are the parties’ competing motions concerning their settlement agreement. Pro se Plaintiff Joshua Arebalo seeks to set aside the settlement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Not. of Mot. and Mot. to Set Aside Settlement and Vacate Order to Temporarily Stay Matter (“Arebalo Mot.”), Dkt. No. 71. Defendant Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) moves to enforce the settlement. Def.’s Not of Mot. and Mot. to Enforce Settlement (“Apple Mot.”), Dkt. No. 85. The Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the Court DENIES Arebalo’s …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.