Kimner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 AUDREY L. KIMNER, Case No. 5:21-cv-06488-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

v. PETER HANN, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 19 ll Defendants. On February 2, 2022, Magistrate Judge DeMarchi issued a report and recommendation advising that the undersigned deny Plaintiff Audrey Kimner’s motion to proceed in forma || pauperis. See Dkt. No. 19. Plaintiff did not file any timely objections. Where a party fails to object to a report and recommendation, the Court is not required to conduct “any review at a || all... of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2003). Because there is no objection, the Court may accept the recommendation without review. Nevertheless, even after a de novo…