Spiers

Spiers v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20223:20-cv-01357California1,645 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DACARI SPIERS, Case No. 20-cv-01357-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR SANCTIONS

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN Re: Dkt. No. 96 FRANCISCO, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 On August 10, 2021, the parties reached a settlement in principle, pending approval by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. (Dkt. No. 92; see Dkt. No. 94 at 2.) On December 22, 2021, Plaintiff filed the instant motion for sanctions. (Dkt. No. 96.) Following a Case Management Conference, the Court ordered Defendants to provide a status report on the issues raised in Plaintiff’s motion. (Dkt. Nos. 100, 103; see Dkt. No. 105.) After carefully considering the parties’ briefing, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the March 3, 2022 hearing, and GRANTS the motion in PART as set forth below. BACKGROUND Plaintiff’s counsel also represents the plaintiff in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.