Khan
Khan v. Payton
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20225:20-cv-03086California541 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MUHAMMAD KHAN, Case No. 20-03086 BLF (PR)
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART
MOTION FOR THIRD EXTENSION
v. OF TIME TO FILE SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT;
M. PAYTON, DENYING MOTION FOR STAY
Defendant. (Docket No. 30)
17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against an officer at San Quentin State Prison. Dkt. No. 1. On June 14, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and granted leave to amend an equal protection claim. Dkt. No. 22. In the alternative, Plaintiff was advised that he may file notice to proceed solely on the cognizable claims identified in the order. Id. at 8. Plaintiff has filed a motion for a stay or a third extension of time of 120-180 days to file a second amended complaint. Dkt. No. 30. For good cause shown, Plaintiff’s motion is…