Khan

Khan v. Payton

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20225:20-cv-03086California541 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MUHAMMAD KHAN, Case No. 20-03086 BLF (PR)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART

MOTION FOR THIRD EXTENSION

v. OF TIME TO FILE SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT;

M. PAYTON, DENYING MOTION FOR STAY

Defendant. (Docket No. 30)

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against an officer at San Quentin State Prison. Dkt. No. 1. On June 14, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and granted leave to amend an equal protection claim. Dkt. No. 22. In the alternative, Plaintiff was advised that he may file notice to proceed solely on the cognizable claims identified in the order. Id. at 8. Plaintiff has filed a motion for a stay or a third extension of time of 120-180 days to file a second amended complaint. Dkt. No. 30. For good cause shown, Plaintiff’s motion is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.