Panah

Panah v. State of California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20225:14-cv-00166California5,563 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOOMAN PANAH,

Case No. 14-00166 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT v. ODOM’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; REFERRING CASE TO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF SETTLEMENT PROCEEDINGS;

STAYING CASE; INSTRUCTIONS

CORRECTIONS AND

TO CLERK

REHABILITATION, et al.,

Defendants. (Docket No. 237)

17 Plaintiff, an inmate on death row at California’s San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”), filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging unconstitutional acts by SQSP correctional officers. Dkt. No. 1. The operative complaint in this action is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) along with a supplemental complaint. Dkt. Nos. 54, 67. The Court found the SAC and supplemental stated cognizable claims, and ordered the matter served on Defendants. Dkt. No. 69. On September 29, 2020, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.