Gonzalez

Gonzalez v. Apttus Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20223:21-cv-01844California2,800 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 YANIRA GONZALEZ, Case No. 21-cv-01844-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR

v. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

APTTUS CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 49 Defendant.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Yanira Gonzalez, pro se, brought this action against her former employer Defendant Apttus Corporation asserting discrimination based on age, sex, and disability. Apttus moves for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that Gonzalez waited too long to file an administrative charge with the EEOC as required for her federal claims, and that she cannot proceed on claims under New York law when she alleges that she was employed in California. The Court finds the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the motion hearing previously set for March 4, 2022 at 9:30 AM Pacific Time, although the case management conference set for the same time remains on calendar and will proceed as scheduled. For the reasons discussed below,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.