Meta Platforms, Inc. v. BrandTotal Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20223:20-cv-07182California509 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 META PLATFORMS, INC., Case No. 20-cv-07182-JCS

Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO

v. FILE UNDER SEAL

BRANDTOTAL LTD., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 245, 249, 253 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”) filed an administrative motion to consider whether its motion for discovery sanctions (dkt. 245), and documents submitted therewith, should be filed under seal based on designations of confidentiality by Defendants BrandTotal Ltd. and Unimania, Inc. (collectively, “BrandTotal”). The sanctions motion, which seeks (among other relief) an instruction that the finder of fact at trial may presume certain facts to be true, is “more than tangentially related to the merits” of the case and thus requires “compelling reasons” to maintain related briefing and evidence under seal. See generally Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2016). BrandTotal has also moved to file under seal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.