Foster

Foster v. Adams and Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20223:18-cv-02723California7,471 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CAROL FOSTER, et al., Case No. 18-cv-02723-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

v. FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS

ACTION SETTLEMENT; MOTIONS

ADAMS AND ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES, COSTS, Defendants. AND INCENTIVE AWARDS 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 236, 237, 241

13 Carol Foster and Theo Foreman brought this class action under the Employee Retirement 14 Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et seq., on behalf of participants and 15 beneficiaries of the Adams and Associates Employee Stock Ownership Plan. Plaintiffs allege that 16 Adams and Associates, Inc., Roy A. Adams, Leslie G. Adams, Daniel B. Norem, Joy Curry 17 Norem, and The Daniel Norem Revocable Trust Dated January 9, 2002, (collectively 18 “Defendants”) breached their fiduciary duty to Plaintiffs, participated in prohibited transactions, 19 failed to make required disclosures, and improperly agreed to indemnification. The Court 20 previously certified a class under Federal Rules of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.