Contour IP Holding, LLC v. GoPro, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20223:17-cv-04738California5,511 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BACKGROUND

27 necessary to understand the resolution of this issue. Contour originally filed this suit in 2017. Dkt. No. 1. It filed a second case in 2021 that asserted the same claims of the same patents against more recent GoPro products. See 2143 Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”). I consolidated the cases. Dkt. No. 532. The patents-in-suit concern point-of- view digital video cameras. Contour asserts Claim 11 of U.S. Patent No. 8,890,954 (“the ’954 Patent”) and Claim 3 of U.S. Patent No. 8,896,694 (“the ’694 Patent”). See Compl. ¶¶ 78–123. Claim 11 of the ‘954 patent, which the parties treat as representative, is as follows:

11. A portable, point of view digital video camera, comprising:

a lens;

an image sensor configured to capture light propagating through the lens and representing a scene, and produce real time video image data of the scene; 11 a wireless connection protocol device configured to send real time image content by wireless transmission directly to and receive control signals or data signals by wireless transmission directly from a personal portable computing device…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.