Saul

Garland v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20224:19-cv-03308-DMRCalifornia1,355 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID G., Case No. 19-cv-03308-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEYS' FEES

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Re: Dkt. No. 33 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff David G. filed a complaint seeking to reverse the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s administrative decision to deny his application for benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. The court granted Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings. [Docket No. 29.] Following remand, an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that Plaintiff is disabled and entitled to past-due disability benefits. Plaintiff’s counsel Katherine Siegfried now moves for an award of attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). [Docket No. 33.] This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.