Mogan

Mogan v. Sacks, Ricketts & Case LLP

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20223:21-cv-08431California1,479 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL MOGAN, Case No. 21-cv-08431-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY

v. Re: Dkt. No. 69 SACKS, RICKETTS & CASE LLP, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Michael Mogan brought this case against Airbnb and three of its employees (collectively, the “Airbnb Defendants”) and counsel that represented the Airbnb Defendants, Sacks, Ricketts & Case, LLP and two of its attorneys (collectively, the “SRC Defendants”) for claims related to a sanction award against him in an underlying state court action. On January 10, 2022, the Court granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss as to all claims. As the SRC Defendants brought their motion under California’s anti-SLAPP statute, the Court directed them to file a separate motion for attorney’s fees, which is now pending. ECF No. 61. Separately, on January 12, the Court granted the Airbnb Defendants’ motion for Rule 11 sanctions and directed them to file a separate fees motion, which is also pending. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.