Progressive Democrats For Social Justice v. Rob Bonta

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20224:21-cv-03875California9,397 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATS FOR Case No. 21-cv-03875-HSG SOCIAL JUSTICE, et al., ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROB BONTA,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 43, 45 Defendant. 12 Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. The Court held a hearing on the cross-motions. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion and DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion. I. BACKGROUND On May 28, 2021, Plaintiffs Progressive Democrats for Social Justice (“PDSJ”), Krista Henneman, and Carlie Ware filed an ex parte application for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) forbidding Defendant Rob Bonta, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, from enforcing California Government Code § 3205 against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.