Little
Little v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL LITTLE, Case No. 22-cv-00300-TSH
Little,
ORDER RE: MOTION TO REMAND;
v. MOTION TO DISMISS
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Re: Dkt. Nos. 12, 15 COMPANY, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court are a Motion to Remand (ECF No. 12), filed by Plaintiff Michael Little, and a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 15), filed by Defendants Pacific Gas and Electric Company and PG&E Corporation (collectively “PG&E”). On February 3, 2022, PG&E filed an Opposition to Little’s Motion to Remand (ECF No. 20) and, on February 11, 2022, Little filed a Reply (ECF No. 25). On February 4, 2022, Little filed an Opposition to PG&E’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 22) and, on February 11, 2022, PG&E filed a Reply (ECF No. 23). The Court finds these matters suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the March 10, 2022 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ …