Tooker

Tooker v. Mak

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20224:20-cv-07373California2,885 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHARLES W. TOOKER, Case No. 20-cv-07373-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES;

GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL; SUA

T MAK, et al., SPONTE GRANTING EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION

Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 33

13 Plaintiff, an inmate housed at Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”), has filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendants CTF lieutenants Mak and Deverick, and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations (“CDCR”) appeals coordinator Lee, denied him due process with respect to his disciplinary proceedings. Dkt. Nos. 1, 6. Defendants have filed a motion to compel further responses to their discovery requests, Dkt. No. 28; a motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 32; an administrative motion to file certain documents under seal, Dkt. No. 33. For the reasons set forth below, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.