Tooker
Tooker v. Mak
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHARLES W. TOOKER, Case No. 20-cv-07373-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
v. COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES;
GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL; SUA
T MAK, et al., SPONTE GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION
Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 33
13 Plaintiff, an inmate housed at Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”), has filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendants CTF lieutenants Mak and Deverick, and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations (“CDCR”) appeals coordinator Lee, denied him due process with respect to his disciplinary proceedings. Dkt. Nos. 1, 6. Defendants have filed a motion to compel further responses to their discovery requests, Dkt. No. 28; a motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 32; an administrative motion to file certain documents under seal, Dkt. No. 33. For the reasons set forth below, the…