Taad

Taad v. Bigge Crane and Rigging Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20224:22-cv-00350California305 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JASON TAAD, Case No. 22-cv-00350-JST

Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 Re: ECF No. 17 BIGGE CRANE AND RIGGING CO., Defendant.

12 On February 16, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to remand this case to state court. ECF No. 17. Defendant’s opposition was due March 2, 2022. Id. The deadline has passed, and no opposition has been filed. If Defendant does not oppose the motion, it was required to “file with the Court a Statement of Non-Opposition within the time for filing and serving any opposition.” Civ. L.R. 7-3(b). Defendant is ordered to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition by March 22, 2022. Defendant is also ordered to show cause in writing by March 22, 2022 why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the Court’s local rules. See Civ. L.R. 1-4; Oliva v. Sullivan, 958 F.2d 272, 273 (9th Cir. 1992) (“District courts have inherent power to control their dockets and may impose sanctions, including dismissal, in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.