Hanson
Hanson v. Dowling
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division CHRISTINA HANSON, Case No. 22-cv-01084-LB
Plaintiff,
ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT
v. WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Re: ECF No. 1 Defendants. 16 INTRODUCTION The plaintiff, who represents herself, sued the “NSA/FBI,” claiming that Charles Dowling (a federal law-enforcement agent who works for the “NSA” or possibly the FBI in its Oakland field office) (1) said that she is an informant (when she is not) and (2) implanted a “Stargate Remote Viewing Device” in her right eye.1 She filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d).2 The court previously granted the application because — even though it lists her gross monthly income as $22,500 — this apparently is a typo or an annual amount because the plaintiff is receiving Social Security disability income.3 Before directing the United States Marshal