Whitley

Whitley v. Javate

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20225:20-cv-00680California6,202 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REGINALD WHITLEY,

Case No. 20-00680 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;

DENYING OTHER PENDING

DR. ROSANA JAVATE, MOTION AS MOOT Defendant. (Docket Nos. 30, 60)

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical staff at the Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). Dkt. No. 1. The Court found the amended complaint, Dkt. No. 13, stated a cognizable claim under the Eighth Amendment and ordered Defendant Dr. Rosana Javate to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. Dkt. No. 14. Defendant Javate filed a motion pursuant to Rule 56 on the ground that undisputed material facts show that she is entitled to summary judgment on the merits and that she is entitled to qualified immunity. Dkt. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.