Armstrong-Harris
Armstrong-Harris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CEDRIC ARMSTRONG-HARRIS, Case No. 21-cv-07637-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants.
On July 28, 2021, pro se Plaintiff Cedric Armstrong-Harris filed a complaint against Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) and Specialized Loan Servicing in Alameda Superior Court. Dkt. No. 1. Wells Fargo removed the case to federal court, id., and after Plaintiff failed to respond to Wells Fargo’s Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 7, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, Dkt. No. 16. Even though Plaintiff responded nine days late to the Order to Show Cause, see Dkt. No. 17, the Court gave Plaintiff extra time to respond to the Motion to Dismiss, directing Plaintiff to file any opposition by February 18, 2022, Dkt. No. 18. However, Plaintiff once again entirely failed to 19 meet Court deadlines. He has not filed an opposition or a statement of…