District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Greater Bay Flooring, Inc.

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

7 DISTRICT COUNCIL 16 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND WELFARE Case No. 21-cv-02976-PJH 8 TRUST FUND, et al.,

9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

10 v. Re: Dkt. No. 24 11 GREATER BAY FLOORING, INC., 12 Defendant. 13

14 Before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment. The matter is fully 15 briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers 16 and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good 17 cause appearing, the court rules as follows. 18 A. Background 19 i. Factual History 20 This case is an enforcement action under the Employee Retirement Income 21 Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). Compl. (Dkt. 1) ¶ 3. Plaintiffs are employee benefit 22 funds and their trustees. Id. ¶ 1. The District Council 16 Northern California Health and 23 Welfare Trust Fund (“Health Fund”), the District Council 16 Northern California 24 Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust Fund…