Sayles

Sayles v. Alameda County, Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20223:21-cv-08243California574 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 WALTER SAYLES, Case No. 21-cv-08243-VKD

Petitioner,

ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT TO A

v. DISTRICT JUDGE

ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT,

12 Respondent.

13 On October 22, 2021, Walter Sayles, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, claiming he is eligible for a youth offender parole hearing and that his sentence is unconstitutional. Dkt. No. 1 at 3, 4. He later filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. No. 4. Mr. Sayles was convicted and sentenced in Alameda County Superior Court, and he is currently confined in San Luis Obispo, in the Central District of California. On February 25, 2022, the Court transferred the matter to the Central District pursuant to Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b)(2). Dkt. No. 8. On March 3, 2022, the Central District transferred the matter back to this Court, observing that the petition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.