Carter

Carter v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20223:21-cv-09428California2,970 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MARNIE CARTER, et al., Case No. 21-cv-09428-JCS Plaintiffs, 10 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AND TO

TARGET CORPORATION, REMAND TO STATE COURT

12 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 10

14 15 I. INTRODUCTION In this action, Plaintiffs Marnie and Stephen Carter assert claims based on slip and fall accidents that occurred on September 16, 2018 and January 5, 2019 at the Target retail store in Pleasant Hill, California. Plaintiffs initially filed the action in Contra Costa Superior Court, asserting claims of negligence, willful failure to warn, and dangerous condition of public property against Defendant Target Corporation (“Target”) and Does 1-50 and served the complaint on Target on November 8, 2021. Target timely removed the action to federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b). Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.