Deschamps

Deschamps v. City of Sausalito

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20223:22-cv-00928California1,034 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PHILIP DESCHAMPS, Case No. 22-cv-00928-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT AND MOTION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

CITY OF SAUSALITO, et al., Docket No. 14 Defendants.

12 13 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Philip Deschamps’s amended complaint and request for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). A hearing was held on the TRO motion on March 11, 2022. Although the Court did not address the amended complaint at the hearing, the Court does so now. The Court has an obligation to review the amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Mr. Deschamps has asserted a number of claims, based on both federal and state law. For example, he claims violation of the federal Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. He also asserts federal and state claims for cruel and unusual punishment, state- created danger, unlawful seizure of property, and violation of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.