Outdoor Pro Shop, Inc. v. Monster Energy Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20225:20-cv-05999California2,467 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 OUTDOOR PRO SHOP, INC., Case No. 20-cv-05999-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE FEBRUARY 16, 2022

v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE

MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 42 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Outdoor Pro Shop, Inc. (“OPS”) and defendant Monster Energy Company (“Monster”) ask the Court to resolve several disputes concerning Monster’s discovery from OPS. Dkt. No. 42. The Court held a hearing on the matter on March 8, 2022. Dkt. No. 44. For the reasons explained at the hearing and below, the Court resolves the disputes as set forth below. I. BACKGROUND OPS asserts claims for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and unfair competition against Monster. Dkt. No. 25. Monster denies liability, and asserts its own claims for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and unfair competition against OPS. Dkt. No. 26. OPS denies it is liable to Monster. Dkt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.