Doe
Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANE DOE, Case No. 19-cv-03310-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: UBER’S MOTION TO
v. COMPEL AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR SANCTIONS
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 165, 172 Defendants.
12 Uber’s motion to compel to Plaintiff to respond a request for the production of documents and Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions based on Uber’s motion to compel are pending before the Court. (Dkt. Nos. 165, 172.) After carefully considering the parties’ briefs and the relevant legal authority, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, and DENIES Uber’s motion to compel and GRANTS IN PART Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions for the reasons set forth below. DISCUSSION A. Uber’s Motion to Compel On January 29, 2022, Uber moved to compel responses to a discovery request that it served on plaintiff eight days earlier. (Dkt. No. 165.) Uber’s motion is procedurally improper on multiple levels. 23 …