Harris

Harris v. Acts Syrene Apartments

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20224:22-cv-00405California5,502 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GAITHER S. HARRIS,

Case No. 22-cv-00405-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE REVIEW UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915

ACTS SYRENE APARTMENTS,

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR Defendant. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 11 Dkt. No. 3

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff in this action is proceeding pro se. The Court has granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and therefore is required to review the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s complaint to determine whether it satisfies 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s claims are insufficiently pled. Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed. Plaintiff shall file a response to this Order addressing why his claims are sufficiently pled no later than April 15, 2022. Alternatively, Plaintiff may attempt to cure the deficiencies identified…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.