Brown

Brown v. NATURES PATH FOODS, INC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20224:21-cv-05132California5,108 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MOLLY BROWN, et al., Case No. 21-cv-05132-HSG Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. DISMISS NATURES PATH FOODS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendant. 12 This putative class action lawsuit alleges that Defendant Nature’s Path Foods, Inc.’s (“Nature’s Path”) breakfast and snack products falsely advertise the amount of protein they contain. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Pending before the Court is Nature’s Path’s Motion to Dismiss, for which briefing is complete. See Dkt. Nos. 18 (“Mot.”), 23 (“Opp.”), and 26 (“Reply”). For the reasons provided below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Molly Brown, Parsa Miller, and Lauren Morgan are consumers in California who allege that they were deceived into buying Nature’s Path’s breakfast and snack products (the “Products”) based on the statements Nature’s Path makes on its packaging about…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.