Carter

Carter v. Spiegel

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20223:21-cv-03990California1,232 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOCELYN CARTER, Case No. 21-cv-03990-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES

JEFFREY SPIEGEL, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 34 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Jocelyn Carter sued Defendants Jeffrey and Ryan Spiegel for negligent misrepresentation, securities fraud and unjust enrichment. ECF No. 1. The Court granted Defendants’ motion to compel Plaintiff to arbitrate her claims against them. ECF No. 33.1 Defendants now move for attorneys’ fees pursuant to paragraph 9.12 of the Operating Agreement for Fortune Film Fund, Two, LLC (“FF2”), which states that “[i]n the event of any litigation, arbitration or other dispute arising as a result of or by reason of this Agreement, the prevailing party in any such litigation, arbitration or other dispute shall be entitled to, in addition to any other damages assessed, its reasonable attorneys’ fees, and all other costs and expenses incurred in connection with settling…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.