Doe
Doe v. City Of Concord
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANE DOE, Case No. 20-cv-02432-JD
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS
v. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
CITY OF CONCORD, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 47, 48, 49, 50 Defendants.
12 After the dismissal of the first amended complaint with leave to amend, Dkt. No. 45, pro se plaintiff Jane Doe filed a second amended complaint against the City of Concord; City of Cotati; County of Contra Costa; County of Sonoma; and individuals in the Concord Police Department, Cotati Police Department, Contra Costa County District Attorney’s Office, and Sonoma County District Attorney’s Office. Dkt. No. 46 (SAC). Overall, very little has changed in Doe’s presentation of her claims, and defendants have moved to dismiss the SAC. Dkt. Nos. 47, 48, 49, 59. Dismissal is warranted. The SAC does not state a plausible equal protection claim against defendants. Because Doe has had several opportunities to present a plausible claim, the complaint …