Wolfe

Wolfe v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20224:20-cv-05492California2,759 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AILEANA W.,

Case No. 20-cv-05492-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, REMAND

10 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 24, 29

Plaintiff Aileana W. moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which found Plaintiff not disabled and therefore denied her application for benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. Plaintiff asks the court to remand this matter for award of benefits. [Docket No. 24.] The Commissioner concedes that the final administrative decision must be reversed but seeks remand for further proceedings instead of an award of benefits. [Docket No. 29.] For the reasons stated below, the court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, grants the Commissioner’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.