Pauly

Pauly v. Stanford Health Care

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20223:18-cv-05387California2,626 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MAKENZIE PAULY, Case No. 18-cv-05387-SI (TSH)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: FIFTH DISCOVERY

v. DISPUTE, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR

TERMINATING SANCTIONS

STANFORD HEALTH CARE, Re: Dkt. Nos. 104, 105, 113, 117, 118, 124, Defendant. 135

13 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court are the parties’ fifth discovery dispute (ECF No. 104) and Plaintiff’s Motion for Terminating Sanctions (ECF No. 105). The Court finds these matters suitable for disposition without oral argument. See CIV. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Terminating Sanctions. The Court ORDERS Stanford to produce a color copy of the MTPCR and Stanford’s November 2008 and December 2008 policies and procedures relating to Plaintiff’s treatment by March 21, 2022. II. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.