Starr Indemnity & Liability Company v. Amguard Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20223:20-cv-00959California2,922 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STARR INDEMNITY & LIABILITY Case No. 20-cv-00959-SI

COMPANY,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY v. JUDGMENT 10 AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 117, 136, 145 11 Defendant. 12 Defendant AmGUARD Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment is scheduled for a hearing on March 17. 2022. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that the matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The Court finds that all of the material discussed in Starr’s administrative motion to seal (Dkt. Nos. 136 and 145) should be filed in the public record except Exhibit 5 to the Mandegary Declaration. However, AmGUARD is advised that at the time of trial, if Exhibit 5 is entered into evidence, it will be done so in the public record (though redactions may be permitted). 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.