Arroyo, Jr. v. Quach, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAFAEL ARROYO, JR., Case No. 21-cv-08778-JST
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v. 9 Re: ECF No. 19 QUACH, INC., Defendant.
12 Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr. served his complaint on Defendant Quach, Inc. in this case on December 26, 2021. Under General Order 56, the parties were therefore required to complete a joint site inspection by February 24, 2022. See id. ¶ 7. The parties did not comply with that deadline. See ECF No. 19. Instead, on March 9, 2022 – almost two weeks after the deadline passed – they filed a request to forego the joint inspection. Id. The Court has already frequently been required to address Plaintiff’s counsel’s failure to comply with Court deadlines. See, e.g., Johnson v. Silvercreek Yuba I, LLC, Case No. 21-cv-05907; Johnson v. Gamba, Case No. 21-cv- 06708; Whitaker v. Sugarman, Case No. 4:21-cv-07308; Johnson v. T&V Investment, Inc., Case No. 21-cv-09162. The parties are ordered to show cause in writing by May 24, 2022, why sanctions…