Lindblad

Lindblad v. Bolanos

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20223:21-cv-06606California555 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT LINDBLAD, Case No. 21-cv-06606-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 46, 50, 51, 54 CARLOS G. BOLANOS, et al., Defendants.

12 Before the Court are several pending motions: (1) Defendant’s 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the complaint, Dkt. No. 46; (2) Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint, Dkt. No. 50; (3) Plaintiff’s motion to subpoena video evidence, Dkt. No. 51; and (4) Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to oppose defendant’s motion, Dkt. No. 54. The Court orders as follows: 17 (1) Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 46 – MOOT Because the Court will grant plaintiff’s motion to file an amended complaint, defendant’s motion to dismiss is moot. The motion hearing scheduled for March 25, 2022 is accordingly VACATED. The Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for March 25, 2022 is CONTINUED to April 22, 2022 at 2:30pm. 23 (2) Motion to Amend, Dkt. No. 50 – GRANTED …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.