Efimenko

Efimenko v. The Catalina Marketing Corporation Group Life Plan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20224:21-cv-01550California4,072 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANNA EFIMENKO, Case No. 21-cv-01550-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

THE CATALINA MARKETING Re: Dkt. No. 31 CORPORATION GROUP LIFE PLAN, et al.,

Defendants.

13 Pending before the Court is the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Catalina Marketing Corporation Group Life Plan and Catalina Marketing Corporation (collectively, “Catalina”). Dkt. No. 31. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Anna Efimenko filed this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”) in March 2021. See Dkt. No. 1. She filed an amended complaint in May 2021. See Dkt. No. 27 (“FAC”). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.